[PATCH 1/2] ARM: Differentiate SheevaPlugs and DockStars on the basis of the memory size.
Alexander Holler
holler at ahsoftware.de
Thu Apr 7 17:31:08 EDT 2011
Am 07.04.2011 10:55, schrieb Alexander Clouter:
> In gmane.linux.kernel Alexander Holler<holler at ahsoftware.de> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I don't feel the need to waste my time prodcuing patches to get
>> them called "abominations". Which means my willingness to post further
>> patches just got below zero.
>>
> In a posting from Nico before you got offended it was explained to you
> *why* it was a Bad Idea(tm) and that that sort of thing simply does not
> work. As a game, is it really a situation with *zero* probability of
> occuring that someone might produce a kirkwood/Sheeva flavoured board
> with only 128MB RAM?
>
> As well as a willingness to 'produce' patches (which to be frank
> *anyone* can do[1])...the hard part is producing *good* patches. To
> produce good patches you need to read and understand the wisdom you get
> back from the mailing lists you post to. If you do not understand the
> reasoning, ask.
>
> This is why you see [PATCHv${BIGNUM}] so often in a number of mailing
> lists. If you are not willing to accept *everyone*, including yourself,
> writes crap code...well the value of your patches falls below zero.
Requiring a machine ID and the needed stuff to handle that for a board
which just is using two GPIOs different than another board is why the
ARM tree exploded. And requiring a machine ID just to follow the rule
that a machine ID is much better than some pretty unique hw feature is
in my humble opinion senseless and that the resulting code is more
readable and better to maintain is a myth.
Sorry that I wanted to help there. Will not try it again.
Regards,
Alexander
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list