[PATCH 1/2] ARM: Differentiate SheevaPlugs and DockStars on the basis of the memory size.
holler at ahsoftware.de
Wed Apr 6 19:22:27 EDT 2011
On 07.04.2011 01:01, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> On 06.04.2011 23:44, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>>> It is possible to differentiate a SheevaPlugs and DockStars on the basis
>>>> of the memory size.
>>>> This makes it possible to unify both setup files.
>>> No no no !!! This is an abomination!
>>> We are not going to reduce the amount of code under arch/arm/ with such
>>> fragile hacks. This would create an even worse maintenance problem the
>>> day either of those devices is released with more RAM or whatever.
>> DockStars are already obsolet and vanilla Linux was never supported by the
>> manufacturer (Seagate). And they never used the machine type in question.
> Is the code for DockStar in mainline actually useful? If no then we may
> simply delete it.
I don't know, I can't speak for others.
>> So I don't think this in any way a fragile hack.
> Determining a machine type based on its amount of RAM is fragile, ugly
> and sets up a bad example for even more hacky tricks like this to crop
> up. If someone is experimenting with his SheevaPlug by giving different
> memory information in the kernel cmdline e.g. to create memory holes in
> order to test some memory allocator changes, then the kernel may think
> that it is not running on a SheevaPlug but a DockStar, and the resulting
> behavior will certainly be unexpected.
People doing such should now what they do. And the pr_info() in the
"abomination" should be enough to give those experimenters a hint (if it
is missing or new).
>> Anyway, it was just a suggestion.
> Better luck next time.
Sorry, I don't feel the need to waste my time prodcuing patches to get
them called "abominations". Which means my willingness to post further
patches just got below zero.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel