[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: mxc: Introduce imx_add_gpio_leds
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Tue Apr 5 03:30:30 EDT 2011
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:52:43PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Monday, April 04, 2011 11:18 AM, Russell King wrote:
> >>> If you go to the effort of making it _that_ generic, then it shouldn't
> >>> even be in plat-mxc, but somewhere *everyone* can benefit from it. See
> >>> Linus' complaints in the OMAP pull request thread about the amount of
> >>> largely similar arch/arm code.
> >>
> >> If it's made generic, mach-ep93xx/core.c could use it to register it's two
> >> platform leds. Please keep me in the loop if this is done.
> >
> > In which case we don't want "if it's made generic", we *require* it to be
> > generic.
Yeah, definitely. I already tried once to make the device registration
that we use on mxc globally available.
> > As I say, we *must* get away from the idea that something in mach-xyz has
> > nothing to do with our own development in mach-abc, and start taking an
> > interest in consolidating some of this stuff. Otherwise we may get to
> > the point where further arch/arm development is barred from the mainline
> > kernel.
>
> How about something like this:
>
> int __init gpio_led_platform_register(int id, struct gpio_led *leds, int nr)
> {
> struct gpio_led_platform_data *pdata;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> int ret;
>
> pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pdata)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> pdev = platform_device_alloc("leds-gpio", id);
> if (!pdev) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_free;
> }
>
> pdata->leds = leds;
> pdata->num_leds = nr;
> pdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
> if (ret)
> goto out_pdev;
> return 0;
>
> out_pdev:
> platform_device_put(pdev);
> out_free:
> kfree(pdata);
> return ret;
> }
I like my approach better, without using mxc specific functions it would
look as follows:
struct platform_device *__init gpio_led_register_device(
const gpio_led_platform_data *pdata)
{
struct platform_device *ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
struct gpio_led_platform_data *_pdata = *pdata;
_pdata->leds = kmemdup(pdata->leds,
pdata->num_leds * sizeof(*pdata->leds), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!_pdata->leds)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
ret = platform_device_register_resndata(NULL, "leds-gpio", -1,
NULL, 0, _pdata, sizeof(_pdata));
if (IS_ERR(ret))
kfree(_pdata->leds);
return ret;
}
> The the mach-xyz init code just has to:
>
> static struct gpio_led gpio_leds[] = {
> {
> .name = "foo:fooclr",
> .gpio = FOO_GPIO_NUM,
> }, {
> .name = "bar:barclr",
> .gpio = BAR_LED_NUM,
> },
> /* etc. */
> };
>
>
> gpio_led_platform_register(-1, gpio_leds, ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_leds));
Compared to your approach with mine
- gpio_leds could be const __initconst;
- uses only a single parameter which AFAIK saves a few bytes to call
the function;
- you don't have control about the .id member (which IMHO is OK but
might be changed easily);
- you have to call a function with a different name;
(Note all of these are no hard requirements for me, just my thoughts.)
> If some one could suggest a good place for the gpio_led_platform_register function
> I can create a proper patch. Maybe just add it to the end of the leds-gpio.c driver?
mxc uses a central place to register all devices
(arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices). I think for a global approach this won't
scale (e.g. because a single header file is used for all devices), so a
place near the driver is the right thing to do. leds-gpio.c doesn't work
though because then it might end in a module.
I'll send a patch as a reply to this mail.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list