[PATCH 6/6] ARM: gic: use handle_fasteoi_irq for SPIs
Colin Cross
ccross at google.com
Fri Apr 1 16:31:00 EDT 2011
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com> wrote:
> Currently, the gic uses handle_level_irq for handling SPIs (Shared
> Peripheral Interrupts), requiring active interrupts to be masked at
> the distributor level during IRQ handling.
>
> On a virtualised system, only the CPU interfaces are virtualised in
> hardware. Accesses to the distributor must be trapped by the
> hypervisor, adding latency to the critical interrupt path in Linux.
>
> This patch modifies the GIC code to use handle_fasteoi_irq for handling
> interrupts, which only requires us to signal EOI to the CPU interface
> when handling is complete. Cascaded IRQ handling is also updated to use
> the chained IRQ enter/exit functions to honour the flow control of the
> parent chip.
>
> Note that commit 846afbd1 ("GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback")
> broke cascading interrupts by forgetting to add IRQ masking. This is
> no longer an issue because the unmask call is now unnecessary.
>
> Tested on Versatile Express and Realview EB (1176 w/ cascaded GICs).
>
> Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap at codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index f70ec7d..f8719ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -84,15 +84,6 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> /*
> * Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts
> */
> -static void gic_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> - spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> - if (gic_arch_extn.irq_ack)
> - gic_arch_extn.irq_ack(d);
> - writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
> - spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> -}
> -
> static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> @@ -115,6 +106,11 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> }
>
> +static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
> +}
> +
> static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> {
> void __iomem *base = gic_dist_base(d);
> @@ -218,8 +214,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> unsigned int cascade_irq, gic_irq;
> unsigned long status;
>
> - /* primary controller ack'ing */
> - chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>
> spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> status = readl(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
> @@ -236,15 +231,14 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq);
>
> out:
> - /* primary controller unmasking */
> - chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
> .name = "GIC",
> - .irq_ack = gic_ack_irq,
> .irq_mask = gic_mask_irq,
> .irq_unmask = gic_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq,
> .irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
> .irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger,
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -319,7 +313,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
> */
> for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
> set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> }
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
Tested-by: Colin Cross <ccross at android.com>
Works on tegra after fixing the problems with the tegra gpio patch.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list