[PATCH 7/7] ARM: S5PC210: I2C{3, 4, 5, 6, 7} device support
Jassi Brar
jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 02:50:18 EDT 2010
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Jeongbae Seo <jeongbae.seo at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Kyungmin wrote:
>>> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>>>
>>> S5PC210 support more I2C devices than previous SoCs.
>>> And to prevent the wrong usage use the s5p prefix instead of s3c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Kconfig | 15 +++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile | 5 ++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c3.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c4.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c5.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c6.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c7.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig | 25 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile | 5 ++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c3.c | 67
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c4.c | 67
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c5.c | 67
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c6.c | 67
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c7.c | 67
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/iic.h | 5 ++
>>> 15 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c3.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c4.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c5.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c6.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/setup-i2c7.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c3.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c4.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c5.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c6.c
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-i2c7.c
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kyungmin,
>>
>> We are considering another way not to make additional new i2c dev files.
>> In my opinion, this patch looks not bad but we'd better make an effort to
>> avoid having the more similar file.
>
> Actually I also it's not good approach, but as there's no comment or
> discuss about this I send the patches.
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-August/022615.html
>
> If you have good method or approaches, I'm welcome.
First, these are device definitions and gpio set callbacks and
shouldn't take much
of space. So, perhaps these all could be built upon single I2C support
selection.
Second, if we must build them conditionally, how about having all in
one file with
each device's definition and callback surrounded by corresponding ifdef ?
That would alteast save us file-count.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list