[PATCH 5/5] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider in host controller

Jeongbae Seo jeongbae.seo at samsung.com
Thu Sep 30 01:40:17 EDT 2010


Chris wrote:

> Hi Kyungmin, Ben,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > >> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
> > >> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
> > >> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks.
> > >>
> > >> Choose any one from MMC maintainer.
> > >
> > > Both approaches are generally acceptable for MMC, so I would want to
> > > leave it up to the maintainer of the driver in question (which is Ben,
> > > in this case?) to choose between them.
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Did you get the opinion from Ben?
> >
> > I hope this decision will be done before 2.6.37 merge windows start to
> > support SDHCI support on s5pc210.
> 
> Hm, I didn't, and Ben's been silent about the urgent sdhci-s3c patches
> too.  Ben, are you just dealing with a large backlog, or are you
> interested in nominating someone else to take over sdhci-s3c?

Hi Chris, Kyungmin

I'd like to let you know that Ben had reviewed and commented for
"[PATCH v2 2/2] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider" in host
controller in 9/21. However, our response was late due to our holidays. I
made a response in 9/28 that why we use this quirk and now we're waiting for
his opinion.

Kyungmin, did you check Ben's review comments for this ? When I saw it, his
approach is just a bit different from you and me. Please let us know if you
have any idea about his comments.

Thanks,
Best Regards
Jeongbae Seo




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list