Please don't edit the subject. Use S5PC110 & S5PC210 as is

[Jassi Brar]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please don't edit the subject.
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>>> samsung.git;a=commitdiff;h=d8c3d96f5df54251c06686bb00811e4b7e0f6547
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>>> samsung.git;a=commitdiff;h=7dcde8f18b0df4d332d6b359fd6270772a42f71f
>>>
>>> Patches from DMC we decide to use the S5PC110 & S5PC210 as we're only
>>> received the Spec C110 & C210.
>>> Most of people including mobile division don't know the V210 & V310
>>> SOC receptively.
>>>
>>> We're already confusing with names, we always talk with C110 & C210
>>> but works on V210 & V310 directory.
>>>
>>> well question. What's the SOC is used at Galaxy S & wave phone?
>>>
>>> I think S5PC110 is more well known than S5PV210.
>>>
>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/399720/
>>> The conclusion of the 2.6.36 merge window
>>> Systems and processors: Income s.r.o. PXA270 single-board computers,
>>> Wiliboard WBD-111 boards, and Samsung S5PC210-based systems.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kyungmin Park
>>
>> As I'm a maintainer of Samsung S5P SoCs, I would like to use second column
>> in the subject line to indicate the ARCH_XXX name like following.
>> 'ARM: S5PV210: <patch subject>'
>> As you know, it means the patch is mainly regarding ARCH_S5PV210
>> (arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/).
>>
>> It can be help to many people, including me that the title speak where it
>> belong to.
>>
>> And I believe someone who can use git log to see the log and source, S5PC110
>> is in the 'arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/'.
>
> Right, many people are confused where's the s5pc110 codes? and know
> it's under mach-s5pv210.
> And finally know it's almost same S5PC110 = S5PV210 so if it use the
> S5PC110 at subject. not issue.

People will be confused to see S5PC110/C210 in subject line, when
apparently there is no such machine in the kernel.
The decision time was when we moved C110 -> V210 and C210 -> V310
No point invoking the dead, let us move one.