[PATCH] at91: drop at91x40 support
Greg Ungerer
gerg at snapgear.com
Mon Sep 20 01:50:50 EDT 2010
On 19/09/10 00:28, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 19:33 Sat 18 Sep , Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> On 18/09/10 16:22, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>> as it's broken for releases and no one care about it
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD<plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Victor<linux at maxim.org.za>
>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>>> Cc: Greg Ungerer<gerg at snapgear.com>
>>
>> NAK, I care. I sent a fix to this very list about a week ago
>> to fix the current compile problem.
> sorry but not see it
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-September/025404.html
> and I see it failled to build for at least 4 releases and
And this is not really due to the board support code (which
you propose to remove) at all. It is almost always due to
breakage of something else. The patch I reference above is
a good example. Breakage in the non-MMU support code is
another example (and I have another patch I need to send to
fix a problem there too).
> no debug-macro.S for years
> since what 4 or 5 years we just have the timer and irq
I don't follow. What is wrong with
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/debug-macro.S?
The AT91x40 parts are pretty simple, what else do you expect?
> do you have plan to update it?
I don't see anything to update. It does exactly what I want it to do.
The board support code you point at causes me no troubles, and not
very often do I need to fix/change/update it.
> or I do not see the current implementation very usefull so I still prefer to
> drop it
Well, I am sorry, I still disagree.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg at snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list