[PATCH 1/4] OMAP: introduce OPP layer for device-specific OPPs
khilman at deeprootsystems.com
Thu Sep 16 14:01:07 EDT 2010
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
>> owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth
>> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:40 PM
>> To: Linus Walleij
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] OMAP: introduce OPP layer for device-specific
>> Linus Walleij had written, on 09/16/2010 12:07 PM, the following:
>> > 2010/9/16 Kevin Hilman <khilman at deeprootsystems.com>:
>> >> lib/opp/* seems more appropriate to me with the header at
>> >> include/linux/opp.h as Linus suggested.
>> > I second this. I would love to see the generic OPP stuff in
>> > lib/opp/* so we put it in the right place from the beginning and
>> > don't have to painfully refactor everything later (clk.h
>> > especially comes to mind.)
>> cool.. digging a bit deeper into lib directory, I propose the following:
>> any soc specific data (for registration etc) -> goes to
>> arch/<arch>/mach-<soc>/oppdata_xyz.c or what ever they choose
>> the intent being lib/ is no place to put mach or arch specific data
>> definitions.. it is just noise..
>> if folks are ok with this, will post a new rev soonish..
> If you like may be you can take this thread over lkml just to get more
> wider perspective
I propose Nishanth does the slight rework to move this to lib/ and then
post to l-o, l-a-k and lkml for RFC. Note that only the generic parts
should be posted first, the OMAP specific usage of this can be fixed
after the generic parts are accepted.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel