[PATCH] pxa: fix cpu_is_pxa*() not expanded to zero when not configured
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at mvista.com
Tue Sep 7 05:35:24 EDT 2010
Hello.
On 07-09-2010 8:09, Eric Miao wrote:
> Could you give this a run?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/hardware.h
> b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/hardware.h
> index 7f64d24..b036500 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/hardware.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/hardware.h
> @@ -264,23 +264,35 @@
> *<= 0x2 for pxa21x/pxa25x/pxa26x/pxa27x
> * == 0x3 for pxa300/pxa310/pxa320
> */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PXA25x) || defined(CONFIG_PXA27x)
> #define __cpu_is_pxa2xx(id) \
> ({ \
> unsigned int _id = (id)>> 13& 0x7; \
> _id<= 0x2; \
> })
> +#else
> +#define __cpu_is_pxa2xx(id) (0)
Why enclose 0 in parens?
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list