[bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)

Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail.com
Fri Sep 3 19:32:52 EDT 2010

Previous message: [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
Next message: [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> something pretty bizarre is going on here.  The wget output modifies the same 
> file twice, but both patches to this file have the same source sha1 (5645f35):

Previous message: [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
Next message: [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list