[PATCH 2/6] i.MX5/clock: add eCSPI and CSPI clock definitions

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:52:00PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> i.MX51 has two eCSPI and one CSPI controllers, now add clock
> definitions and registrations for these controllers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jason77.wang at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51.c |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51.c
> index 6af69de..217c3f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static struct clk periph_apm_clk;
>  static struct clk ahb_clk;
>  static struct clk ipg_clk;
>  static struct clk usboh3_clk;
> +static struct clk spba_clk;
>  
>  #define MAX_DPLL_WAIT_TRIES	1000 /* 1000 * udelay(1) = 1ms */
>  
> @@ -52,6 +53,18 @@ static int _clk_ccgr_enable(struct clk *clk)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int _clk_ccgr_enable_inrun(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
> +	reg &= ~(MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG_MASK << clk->enable_shift);
> +	reg |= MXC_CCM_CCGRx_MOD_IDLE << clk->enable_shift;
> +	__raw_writel(reg, clk->enable_reg);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
imho this should be consolidated in something like:

static int _clk_ccgr_setclk(struct clk *clk, unsigned mode)
{
	...
}

#define _clk_ccgr_enable(clk) _clk_ccgr_setclk(clk, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_MOD_ON)
#define _clk_ccgr_disable(clk) _clk_ccgr_setclk(clk, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_MOD_OFF)
#define _clk_ccgr_enable_inrun(clk) _clk_ccgr_setclk(clk, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_MOD_IDLE)

>  static void _clk_ccgr_disable(struct clk *clk)
>  {
>  	u32 reg;
> @@ -762,6 +775,61 @@ static struct clk kpp_clk = {
>  	.id = 0,
>  };
>  
> +/* eCSPI */
> +static unsigned long _clk_ecspi_getrate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	u32 reg, prediv, podf;
> +	unsigned long ret;
> +
> +	reg = __raw_readl(MXC_CCM_CSCDR2);
> +	prediv = ((reg & MXC_CCM_CSCDR2_CSPI_CLK_PRED_MASK) >>
> +		  MXC_CCM_CSCDR2_CSPI_CLK_PRED_OFFSET) + 1;
> +	if (prediv == 1)
> +		BUG();
> +	podf = ((reg & MXC_CCM_CSCDR2_CSPI_CLK_PODF_MASK) >>
> +		MXC_CCM_CSCDR2_CSPI_CLK_PODF_OFFSET) + 1;
> +
> +	ret = clk_get_rate(clk->parent) / (prediv * podf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int _clk_ecspi_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
> +{
> +	u32 reg, mux;
> +
> +	mux = _get_mux(parent, &pll1_sw_clk, &pll2_sw_clk, &pll3_sw_clk,
> +		       &lp_apm_clk);
> +	reg = __raw_readl(MXC_CCM_CSCMR1) & ~MXC_CCM_CSCMR1_CSPI_CLK_SEL_MASK;
> +	reg |= mux << MXC_CCM_CSCMR1_CSPI_CLK_SEL_OFFSET;
> +	__raw_writel(reg, MXC_CCM_CSCMR1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct clk ecspi_main_clk = {
> +	.parent = &pll3_sw_clk,
> +	.get_rate = _clk_ecspi_getrate,
> +	.set_parent = _clk_ecspi_set_parent,
Sascha didn't implement set_parent

> +};
> +
> +static struct clk ecspi1_ipg_clk = {
> +	.parent = &ipg_clk,
> +	.secondary = &spba_clk,
> +	.enable_reg = MXC_CCM_CCGR4,
> +	.enable_shift = MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG9_OFFSET,
> +	.enable = _clk_ccgr_enable_inrun,
> +	.disable = _clk_ccgr_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk ecspi2_ipg_clk = {
> +	.parent = &ipg_clk,
> +	.secondary = &aips_tz2_clk,
> +	.enable_reg = MXC_CCM_CCGR4,
> +	.enable_shift = MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG11_OFFSET,
> +	.enable = _clk_ccgr_enable_inrun,
> +	.disable = _clk_ccgr_disable,
> +};
> +
>  #define DEFINE_CLOCK(name, i, er, es, gr, sr, p, s)	\
>  	static struct clk name = {			\
>  		.id		= i,			\
> @@ -814,6 +882,14 @@ DEFINE_CLOCK(hsi2c_clk, 0, MXC_CCM_CCGR1, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG11_OFFSET,
>  DEFINE_CLOCK(fec_clk, 0, MXC_CCM_CCGR2, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG12_OFFSET,
>  	NULL,  NULL, &ipg_clk, NULL);
>  
> +/* eCSPI & CSPI */
> +DEFINE_CLOCK(cspi1_clk, 0, MXC_CCM_CCGR4, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG10_OFFSET,
> +	NULL, NULL, &ecspi_main_clk, &ecspi1_ipg_clk);
> +DEFINE_CLOCK(cspi2_clk, 1, MXC_CCM_CCGR4, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG12_OFFSET,
> +	NULL, NULL, &ecspi_main_clk, &ecspi2_ipg_clk);
> +DEFINE_CLOCK(cspi3_clk, 2, MXC_CCM_CCGR4, MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG13_OFFSET,
> +	NULL, NULL, &ipg_clk, NULL);
> +
Maybe use ecspi1_clk, cspi2_clk, cspi_clk here?  I thought about this,
too, for our code, couldn't really decide.  What do you think?

>  #define _REGISTER_CLOCK(d, n, c) \
>         { \
>  		.dev_id = d, \
> @@ -837,6 +913,9 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("fsl-usb2-udc", "usb", usboh3_clk)
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("fsl-usb2-udc", "usb_ahb", ahb_clk)
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx-keypad.0", NULL, kpp_clk)
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("spi_imx.0", NULL, cspi1_clk)
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("spi_imx.1", NULL, cspi2_clk)
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("spi_imx.2", NULL, cspi3_clk)
>  };
>  

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |