[PATCH 0/6] add spi support for i.MX51 in the existing spi_imx driver

[Jason Wang]

Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:51:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>   
>> Some explanations:
>>
>> This patchset is to add SPI support in the existing spi_imx driver for
>> i.MX51 and add SPI relating stuffs for mx51_3ds board level.
>>
>> i.MX51 has two eCSPI controllers and one CSPI controller, CSPI
>> controller is 100% compatible with the one of i.MX35, so we don't need
>> to add new functions for this CSPI, only bind it with i.MX35 together,
>> while eCSPI isn't compatible with existing controllers of i.MX
>> platforms, so i add new functions for these two eCSPIs in the existing
>> spi_imx driver.
>>
>> If these patches pass review, the first patch 0001-xxx.patch should be
>> merged by Grant.likely; other patches(0002-0006) are based off
>> imx-for-2.6.37 and should be handled by Sascha.
>>     
>
> Unfortunately we (=Pengutronix) have some patches pending to add
> mx51-spi support, too.  And there are some other patches that will
> conflict with your series (e.g. I renamed some symbols used by you:
>
> -#define MX51_CSPI1_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_SPBA0_BASE_ADDR + 0x10000)
> +#define MX51_ECSPI1_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_SPBA0_BASE_ADDR + 0x10000)
> -#define MX51_CSPI2_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR + 0xac000)
> +#define MX51_ECSPI2_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR + 0xac000)
> -#define MX51_CSPI3_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR + 0xc0000)
> +#define MX51_CSPI_BASE_ADDR		(MX51_AIPS2_BASE_ADDR + 0xc0000)
> -#define MX51_MXC_INT_CSPI1		36
> -#define MX51_MXC_INT_CSPI2		37
> -#define MX51_MXC_INT_CSPI		38
> +#define MX51_INT_ECSPI1			36
> +#define MX51_INT_ECSPI2			37
> +#define MX51_INT_CSPI			38
> )
>
> Actually I would prefer our patches, but of course I'm biased :-)
>
> I don't know how we should handle this.  And Sascha is on vacation this
> and next week.  I will investigate if our patches are already free to be
> posted.
>
>   
OK, for conflicting parts, i will wait for new patches to be posted out,
and rebase my conflicting patches off that.

If it is possible, please review other parts first.

Thanks,
Jason.

> Best regards
> Uwe
>
>