[PATCH V3 1/1]MMC: add support of sdhci-pxa driver

[Haojian Zhuang]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:32:46AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
>> > Update with comments from Matt and Eric.
>> > Test with sd and emmc.
>> >
>> > >From e5dd554ed4d3488a83d9a4888d68d1d85482f747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at marvell.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:51:28 -0400
>> > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: add support of sdhci-pxa driver
>> >
>> >     Support Marvell PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD Host Controller
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at marvell.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h |   32 ++++
>> >  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig               |   12 ++
>> >  drivers/mmc/host/Makefile              |    1 +
>> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c           |  259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  4 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c
>>
>> I'll take the drivers/mmc/ hunks, but you should send the plat-pxa/
>> patch through the ARM tree.
>
> Oh.  If we do that then the driver won't compile until everything's
> together, because it #includes <plat/sdhci.h>.  Haojian/Eric, what do
> you prefer here?  Should I take the arch/arm/ hunk via the MMC tree?
> (If so, please provide ACKs.)
>

Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang.

I'm fine on this. Please merge it via the MMC tree.


Thanks
Haojian