[patch 00/12] arm: raw_spinlock annotations
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Oct 19 11:26:45 EDT 2010
On Tuesday 19 October 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While cleaning up my repo I refound the patches and rebased them on top
> of today's Linus' tree and only needed to fix up the l2x0_lock patch as
> in the meantime a new usage hit mainline.
The patches all look harmless, but none of them has any information on
why the particular locks need to be raw_spin_lock. Ideally a raw spinlock
should be the absolute exception, and IMHO should have a comment in front
of it why it is special.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel