[PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: S5P: Reduce duplicated EPLL control codes
Kukjin Kim
kgene.kim at samsung.com
Wed Oct 13 18:56:51 EDT 2010
Seungwhan Youn wrote:
>
> S5P Samsung SoCs has a EPLL to support various PLL clock sources for other
> H/W blocks. Until now, to control EPLL, each of SoCs make their own
functions
> in 'mach-s5pxxx/clock.c'. But some of functions, 'xxx_epll_get_rate()' and
> 'xxx_epll_enable()', are exactly same in all S5P SoCs, so this patch move
> these duplicated codes to common EPLL functions that use platform wide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seungwhan Youn <sw.youn at samsung.com>
> ---
> This patch is re-worked followings, requested by Kukjin Kim, from v2 :-
> o Set re-define S5P_EPLL_CON with specific EPLL definations on S5P
platform.
> o and, keep original EPLL definations.
>
> And also, this patch depends on v1 patch-set which was submitted.
> o [PATCH 1/10] ARM: S5PC100: Add S/PDIF platform device
> o [PATCH 2/10] ARM: S5PC100: Modify SCLK_AUDIO{0,1,2} clock as sysclks
> o [PATCH 3/10] ARM: S5PC100: Add SCLK_SPDIF clock
> o [PATCH 4/10] ARM: S5PV210: Add S/PDIF platform device
> o [PATCH 5/10] ARM: S5PV210: Add SCLK_SPDIF clock
> o [PATCH 6/10] ARM: S5PV210: Add audio clocks as sysclk
> --
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock.c | 18 ------------------
> arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 22
++--------------------
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 20
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h | 4 ++++
> 8 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c
> index f93dcd8..cfccdff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int s5p6440_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk,
unsigned long
> rate)
> }
>
> static struct clk_ops s5p6440_epll_ops = {
> - .get_rate = s5p64x0_epll_get_rate,
> + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> .set_rate = s5p6440_epll_set_rate,
> };
>
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5p6440_setup_clocks(void)
>
> /* Set S5P6440 functions for clk_fout_epll */
>
> - clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p64x0_epll_enable;
> + clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable;
> clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5p6440_epll_ops;
>
> clk_48m.enable = s5p64x0_clk48m_ctrl;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c
> index f9afb05..f1498d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int s5p6450_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk,
unsigned long
> rate)
> }
>
> static struct clk_ops s5p6450_epll_ops = {
> - .get_rate = s5p64x0_epll_get_rate,
> + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> .set_rate = s5p6450_epll_set_rate,
> };
>
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5p6450_setup_clocks(void)
>
> /* Set S5P6450 functions for clk_fout_epll */
>
> - clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p64x0_epll_enable;
> + clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable;
> clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5p6450_epll_ops;
>
> clk_48m.enable = s5p64x0_clk48m_ctrl;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock.c
> index 523ba80..b52c6e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock.c
> @@ -73,24 +73,6 @@ static const u32 clock_table[][3] = {
> {L2 * 1000, (3 << ARM_DIV_RATIO_SHIFT), (0 <<
> S5P64X0_CLKDIV0_HCLK_SHIFT)},
> };
>
> -int s5p64x0_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable)
> -{
> - unsigned int ctrlbit = clk->ctrlbit;
> - unsigned int epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P64X0_EPLL_CON) & ~ctrlbit;
> -
> - if (enable)
> - __raw_writel(epll_con | ctrlbit, S5P64X0_EPLL_CON);
> - else
> - __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P64X0_EPLL_CON);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -unsigned long s5p64x0_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> - return clk->rate;
> -}
> -
> unsigned long s5p64x0_armclk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> {
> unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(clk->parent);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/regs-clock.h
b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5p64x0/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> index 58e1bc8..a133f22 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> @@ -60,4 +60,6 @@
> #define ARM_DIV_RATIO_SHIFT 0
> #define ARM_DIV_MASK (0xF << ARM_DIV_RATIO_SHIFT)
>
> +#define S5P_EPLL_CON S5P64X0_EPLL_CON
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_CLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
> index 306ae74..42c2636 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
> @@ -273,24 +273,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk clk_div_hdmi = {
> .reg_div = { .reg = S5P_CLK_DIV3, .shift = 28, .size = 4 },
> };
>
> -static int s5pc100_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable)
> -{
> - unsigned int ctrlbit = clk->ctrlbit;
> - unsigned int epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON) & ~ctrlbit;
> -
> - if (enable)
> - __raw_writel(epll_con | ctrlbit, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> - else
> - __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static unsigned long s5pc100_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> - return clk->rate;
> -}
> -
> static u32 epll_div[][4] = {
> { 32750000, 131, 3, 4 },
> { 32768000, 131, 3, 4 },
> @@ -347,7 +329,7 @@ static int s5pc100_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk,
unsigned
> long rate)
> }
>
> static struct clk_ops s5pc100_epll_ops = {
> - .get_rate = s5pc100_epll_get_rate,
> + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> .set_rate = s5pc100_epll_set_rate,
> };
>
> @@ -1261,7 +1243,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pc100_setup_clocks(void)
> unsigned int ptr;
>
> /* Set S5PC100 functions for clk_fout_epll */
> - clk_fout_epll.enable = s5pc100_epll_enable;
> + clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable;
> clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pc100_epll_ops;
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-clock.h
b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5pv310/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> index 5d0bb40..9e9e44c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-clock.h
> @@ -157,4 +157,8 @@
> #define S5P_CLKDIV_BUS_GPLR_SHIFT (4)
> #define S5P_CLKDIV_BUS_GPLR_MASK (0x7 <<
> S5P_CLKDIV_BUS_GPLR_SHIFT)
>
> +/* Compatibility defines */
> +
> +#define S5P_EPLL_CON S5P_EPLL_CON0
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_CLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> index 8188009..8d081d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
>
> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> +
> #include <plat/clock.h>
> #include <plat/clock-clksrc.h>
> #include <plat/s5p-clock.h>
> @@ -148,6 +150,24 @@ int s5p_gatectrl(void __iomem *reg, struct clk *clk,
int
> enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int s5p_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable)
> +{
> + unsigned int ctrlbit = clk->ctrlbit;
> + unsigned int epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON) & ~ctrlbit;
> +
> + if (enable)
> + __raw_writel(epll_con | ctrlbit, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> + else
> + __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + return clk->rate;
> +}
> +
> static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = {
> &clk_ext_xtal_mux,
> &clk_48m,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h b/arch/arm/plat-
> s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h
> index 17036c8..2b6dcff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/s5p-clock.h
> @@ -43,4 +43,8 @@ extern struct clksrc_sources clk_src_dpll;
>
> extern int s5p_gatectrl(void __iomem *reg, struct clk *clk, int enable);
>
> +/* Common EPLL operations for S5P platform */
> +extern int s5p_epll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable);
> +extern unsigned long s5p_epll_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_PLAT_S5P_CLOCK_H */
> --
Looks ok to me..will apply.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list