[PATCH 2/2] Adding cs89x0, standard ethernet driver for iMX31 platform.
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Wed Oct 13 12:11:15 EDT 2010
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:25:13PM +0100, Ian Lartey wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:49 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Ian Lartey wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 20:23 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:47:35PM +0100, Ian Lartey wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm/configs/mx3_defconfig | 2 ++
> > > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/mx3_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/mx3_defconfig
> > > > > index 161f907..b0b3409 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm/configs/mx3_defconfig
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/mx3_defconfig
> > > > > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
> > > > > CONFIG_SMSC911X=y
> > > > > CONFIG_DNET=y
> > > > > CONFIG_FEC=y
> > > > > +CONFIG_CS89x0=y
> > > > > +CONFIG_CS89x0_NONISA_IRQ=y
> > > > > # CONFIG_NETDEV_1000 is not set
> > > > > # CONFIG_NETDEV_10000 is not set
> > > > > # CONFIG_INPUT is not set
> > > > This change is bad for two reasons:
> > > >
> > > > - I just tested a kernel with CONFIG_CS89x0=y on a Phytec Phycore
> > > > pcm043 using your updated defconfig and it barfs:
> > > >
> > > > [.....]
> > >
> > > Ouch, I'll see if I can correct that. (Needs to be done before I can add
> > > the config file change). Uwe I don't have another i.MX3 (apart from the
> > > i.MV31ADS) would you be able to test further changes for me please to
> > > help catch this kind of thing ?
> > I'm not sure if I have access to an mx31ads, but we have several i.MX
> > machines in our lab. And I'm willing to give my comments to a general
> > cs89x0 cleanup. (This drivers was one of the first things I saw when I
> > started kernel development. Back then I gave up trying to understand
> > it. :-) So maybe if you don't come around fixing it I might have some
> > energy to do it now with more knowledge about the kernel in general and
> > having seen *much* ugly code.
> I've had a look round but I cannot get a handle on fixing the issue.
no time or no clue?
> I only have an i.mx31ads that failure doesn't occur, sorry I hope you
> have more success than me.
I put in on my todo list, but I don't expect to get that done soon.
> For now I'll resubmit PATCH 1/2 with the changes to board-mx31ads.h and
> board-mx31ads.c but I'll not resubmit this patch to mx3_defconfig so
> nobody will get it by default.
> Does this seem OK to you ?
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel