[PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51

[Yong Shen]

> I still disagree, but it's not important. IMHO most of the uses of
> __raw_readl should be converted to readl or readl_relaxed if you are
> worried about efficiency.
>
> The main difference between __raw_readl and readl_relaxed is that the
> endianess is well-defined on readl_relaxed.
>
>        Arnd
>

I agree with you about that. I will keep that in mind and also notice my
colleages this in our future development.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20101007/133e8673/attachment-0001.html>