[PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: regulator: max8998: voltages and GPIOs defined at platform data structure
l.majewski at samsung.com
Mon Oct 4 02:46:46 EDT 2010
On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:33:33 +0100
Liam Girdwood <lrg at slimlogic.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:43 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Lukasz,
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski at samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
> > Fine with me:
> > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> Lukasz, this is not applying against the regulator next tree.
> Can you redo and add Mark and Samuels Acks.
I've fetched the newest voltage-2.6/for-next and merge it with newest
mfd-2.6/for next. After that all patches are applying and kernel is
building without errors.
The problem with this patch series is that it "touches" two
repositories: voltage-2.6 and mfd-2.6.
I'm a bit confused how such situation should be resolved, since it
involves two separate repositories (and two maintainers to cooperate).
Samsung Poland R0d5c1f412cf166c0cd87b0f6eb7fed70a2&D Center
More information about the linux-arm-kernel