[PATCH 15/54] ARM: ep93xx: irq_data conversion.

Lennert Buytenhek buytenh at wantstofly.org
Tue Nov 30 19:19:45 EST 2010


On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:33:25AM +1300, Ryan Mallon wrote:

> > -static int ep93xx_gpio_irq_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> > +static int ep93xx_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> >  {
> > -	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
> > -	const int gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> > +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + d->irq;
> 
> Is this still correct? I haven't followed much of the irq_data
> discussion, but this post (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/230221/)
> says that with sparse irq converting irq number to irq_desc is now a
> radix tree lookup.
> 
> I get the impression from the above email that we should be avoiding
> using irq_desc directly in these functions?

You are correct in that this construct is no longer valid with
CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ.  It should be using irq_to_desc() instead, or
actually, it should not be looking at the irq_desc here at all.

What ep93xx wants to achieve should be possible to achieve by just
calling set_irq_handler() instead of frobbing fields in the irq_desc
directly -- that would work, right?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list