[PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework
Ohad Ben-Cohen
ohad at wizery.com
Mon Nov 29 04:57:58 EST 2010
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:24 AM, David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net> wrote:
> Your intent "generic" is fine, but you've not achieved it and thus I
> think you shouldn't imply that you have. Dropping the word "generic"
> should suffice; it _is_ a framework, and maybe the next person working
> with hardware spinlocks can finish generalizing (and add use cases).
Sure, I can drop the word "generic".
> Haven't looked at RT in a long time. Just look at the current RT
> patchset to see if it still has several spinlock variants. ISTR the
> "raw" spinlock stuff came from there not long ago. Much compile-time
> magic was involved in switching between variants.
I'll take a look there and see if I catch anything relevant.
Thanks,
Ohad.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list