[PATCH 1/9] spi/pxa2xx: don't use subys initcall for driver init
Mark Brown
broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Wed Nov 24 10:43:46 EST 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:30:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> It would be easy enough to defer cpufreq initialization based on some
> platform defined criteria. It's just an initcall. However, I don't
Though it'd be much better to fix the thing where cpufreq doesn't have a
device anyway.
> know what the impact area is for subsystems that depend on cpufreq.
> Are there drivers that depend on cpufreq before initialized?
OMAP? It'd be fairly surprising if something were to have a strict
dependency, though - more likely to be notifiers I'd expect. Usually
cpufreq comes up fairly late.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list