[PATCH v4 1/5] OMAP: mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of global
Varadarajan, Charulatha
charu at ti.com
Wed Nov 24 00:21:56 EST 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:56, Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2 at ti.com> wrote:
> From: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840 at ti.com>
>
> The variable rq_full flag is a global variable, so if there are multiple
> mailbox users there will be conflicts. Now there is a full flag per
> mailbox queue.
>
> Reported-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad at wizery.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840 at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2 at ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> index 9976565..13f2ef3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct omap_mbox_queue {
> struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
> int (*callback)(void *);
> struct omap_mbox *mbox;
> + bool full;
> };
>
> struct omap_mbox {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> index d2fafb8..48e161c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>
> static struct workqueue_struct *mboxd;
> static struct omap_mbox **mboxes;
> -static bool rq_full;
>
> static int mbox_configured;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(mbox_configured_lock);
> @@ -148,6 +147,12 @@ static void mbox_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> if (mq->callback)
> mq->callback((void *)msg);
> + spin_lock_irq(&mq->lock);
> + if (mq->full) {
> + mq->full = false;
> + omap_mbox_enable_irq(mq->mbox, IRQ_RX);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mq->lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -170,7 +175,7 @@ static void __mbox_rx_interrupt(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
> while (!mbox_fifo_empty(mbox)) {
> if (unlikely(kfifo_avail(&mq->fifo) < sizeof(msg))) {
> omap_mbox_disable_irq(mbox, IRQ_RX);
> - rq_full = true;
> + mq->full = true;
Should this also be inside spin_lock_irq?
> goto nomem;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list