[PATCH] ARM: mx3/pcm037: properly allocate memory for mx3-camera
Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovetski at gmx.de
Tue Nov 23 17:54:48 EST 2010
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> There is no need to memzero the buffer because dma_alloc_coherent zeros
> the memory for us.
>
> This fixes:
>
> BUG: Your driver calls ioremap() on system memory. This leads
> <4>to architecturally unpredictable behaviour on ARMv6+, and ioremap()
> <4>will fail in the next kernel release. Please fix your driver.
>
> Tested-by: Michael Grzeschik <mgr at pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> it seems to work this way, still I'd like to have some feedback if this
> is done right. Russell?
>
> I assume sending a patch to remove the <4> is just a waste of time,
> isn't it?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c
> index 2ff3f66..265757f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> #include <linux/usb/ulpi.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>
> #include <media/soc_camera.h>
>
> @@ -413,29 +414,22 @@ struct mx3_camera_pdata camera_pdata = {
> .mclk_10khz = 2000,
> };
>
> +static phys_addr_t mx3_camera_base __initdata;
> +#define MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE SZ_4M
> +
> static int __init pcm037_camera_alloc_dma(const size_t buf_size)
> {
> - dma_addr_t dma_handle;
> - void *buf;
> int dma;
>
> - if (buf_size < 2 * 1024 * 1024)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - buf = dma_alloc_coherent(NULL, buf_size, &dma_handle, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!buf) {
> - pr_err("%s: cannot allocate camera buffer-memory\n", __func__);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> - memset(buf, 0, buf_size);
> -
> dma = dma_declare_coherent_memory(&mx3_camera.dev,
> - dma_handle, dma_handle, buf_size,
> + mx3_camera_base, mx3_camera_base,
> + MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE,
> DMA_MEMORY_MAP | DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
>
> - /* The way we call dma_declare_coherent_memory only a malloc can fail */
> - return dma & DMA_MEMORY_MAP ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
What was wrong with the original return statement?
Thanks
Guennadi
> + if (!(dma & DMA_MEMORY_MAP))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = {
> @@ -676,6 +670,15 @@ struct sys_timer pcm037_timer = {
> .init = pcm037_timer_init,
> };
>
> +static void __init pcm037_reserve(void)
> +{
> + /* reserve 4 MiB for mx3-camera */
> + mx3_camera_base = memblock_alloc(MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE,
> + /* ??? */ MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE);
> + memblock_free(mx3_camera_base, MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE);
> + memblock_remove(mx3_camera_base, MX3_CAMERA_BUF_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> MACHINE_START(PCM037, "Phytec Phycore pcm037")
> /* Maintainer: Pengutronix */
> .boot_params = MX3x_PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100,
> @@ -683,4 +686,5 @@ MACHINE_START(PCM037, "Phytec Phycore pcm037")
> .init_irq = mx31_init_irq,
> .init_machine = mxc_board_init,
> .timer = &pcm037_timer,
> + .reserve = pcm037_reserve,
> MACHINE_END
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list