[PATCH 6/6 v2] ARM: Add support for the display controllers in VT8500 and WM8505
Alexey Charkov
alchark at gmail.com
Tue Nov 9 05:23:29 EST 2010
2010/11/8 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> On Sunday 07 November 2010, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>> drivers/video/Kconfig | 26 +++
>> drivers/video/Makefile | 3 +
>> drivers/video/vt8500lcdfb.c | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/video/vt8500lcdfb.h | 34 +++
>> drivers/video/wm8505fb.c | 438 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/video/wm8505fb_regs.h | 76 +++++++
>> drivers/video/wmt_ge_rops.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/video/wmt_ge_rops.h | 5 +
>
> From a very brief look, the two drivers look rather similar. What is the
> reason to have separate drivers instead of just one?
>
> Could you perhaps take the common parts and move them into a third module
> that exports symbols to be used by the two drivers?
>
Quite frankly, I would say that all SoC framebuffer drivers are quite
similar ;-) Register offsets, timing formats, accepted pixel formats,
buffer alignment requirements are all different, so I do not really
believe that there'd be much benefit from introducing another
abstraction level. This is open to debate, of course.
Alexey
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list