[patch v4 06/10] efikamx: add leds support
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Tue Nov 2 04:38:58 EDT 2010
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:54:47AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:40:51 Arnaud Patard wrote:
> > The efika mx a 3 leds (1 blue, 1 red, 1 green) connected on GPIOS 3
> > 13/14/15. Also, some special care is done for default trigger of blue led
> > for mmc as the mmc host used is different between hw revisions
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard at rtp-net.org>
> > Index: linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-submit.orig/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2010-10-27
> > 11:26:16.000000000 +0200 +++
> > linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2010-10-27
> > 11:27:38.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/leds.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/fsl_devices.h>
> > @@ -43,6 +44,10 @@
> > #define EFIKAMX_PCBID1 (2*32 + 17)
> > #define EFIKAMX_PCBID2 (2*32 + 11)
> >
> > +#define EFIKAMX_BLUE_LED (2*32 + 13)
> > +#define EFIKAMX_GREEN_LED (2*32 + 14)
> > +#define EFIKAMX_RED_LED (2*32 + 15)
> > +
> > /* the pci ids pin have pull up. they're driven low according to board id
> > */ #define MX51_PAD_PCBID0 IOMUX_PAD(0x518, 0x130, 3, 0x0, 0,
> > PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP) #define MX51_PAD_PCBID1 IOMUX_PAD(0x51C, 0x134, 3,
> > 0x0, 0, PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP) @@ -81,6 +86,11 @@
> > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_1__ESDHC1_WP,
> > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_7__ESDHC2_WP,
> > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_8__ESDHC2_CD,
> > +
> > + /* leds */
> > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_D9__GPIO_3_13,
> > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_VSYNC__GPIO_3_14,
> > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_HSYNC__GPIO_3_15,
> > };
> >
> > /* Serial ports */
> > @@ -179,6 +189,37 @@
> > }
> > }
>
> Maybe this could be modularized ?
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO
> ... the platform_data stuff below ...
>
> efikamx_register_leds()
> {
> platform_device_register();
> }
> #else
> static inline void efikamx_register_leds() {}
> #endif
>
> board_init()
> {
> ...
> efikamx_register_leds();
> ...
> }
>
> What do you think ? Cheers
IMHO it's better to register all devices independently of the available
drivers. So for me the used approach is OK.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list