[PATCH] [ARM] gic: Unmask private interrupts on all cores during IRQ enable
Stephen Caudle
scaudle at codeaurora.org
Mon Nov 1 12:39:55 EDT 2010
Requesting/freeing private peripheral interrupts on multi-core chips that
use only one IRQ number for all cores currently unmasks/masks the interrupt
for only the executing core.
This change prevents the need for a separate call to enable_irq on other
cores after request_irq. Also, shutdown is implemented instead of disable
to allow for lazy IRQ disabling.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Caudle <scaudle at codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index a19a526..fbf5236 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1298,6 +1298,11 @@ config LOCAL_TIMERS
accounting to be spread across the timer interval, preventing a
"thundering herd" at every timer tick.
+config IRQ_PER_CPU
+ bool
+ depends on SMP
+ default n
+
source kernel/Kconfig.preempt
config HZ
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index ada6359..372cfb3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -39,12 +39,25 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
unsigned int irq_offset;
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU
+ struct call_single_data ppi_data;
+#endif
};
#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
#define MAX_GIC_NR 1
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU
+#ifndef GIC_PPI_FIRST
+#define GIC_PPI_FIRST 16
+#endif
+
+#ifndef GIC_PPI_LAST
+#define GIC_PPI_LAST 31
+#endif
+#endif
+
static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR];
static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(unsigned int irq)
@@ -158,6 +171,72 @@ static int gic_set_cpu(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask_val)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU
+static inline void gic_smp_call_function(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ /*
+ * Since this function is called with interrupts disabled,
+ * smp_call_function can't be used here because it warns (even
+ * if wait = 0) when interrupts are disabled.
+ *
+ * __smp_call_function_single doesn't warn when interrupts are
+ * disabled and not waiting, so use it instead.
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ if (cpu != this_cpu)
+ __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data, 0);
+}
+
+static void gic_mask_ppi(void *info)
+{
+ gic_mask_irq(*(unsigned int *)info);
+}
+
+static void gic_unmask_ppi(void *info)
+{
+ gic_unmask_irq(*(unsigned int *)info);
+}
+
+static void gic_enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+ struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+
+ if (irq >= GIC_PPI_FIRST && irq <= GIC_PPI_LAST) {
+ gic_data->ppi_data.func = gic_unmask_ppi;
+ gic_data->ppi_data.info = &desc->irq;
+ gic_data->ppi_data.flags = 0;
+
+ /* Unmask PPIs on all cores during enable. */
+ gic_smp_call_function(&gic_data->ppi_data);
+ }
+
+ desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+ desc->status &= ~IRQ_MASKED;
+}
+
+static void gic_shutdown_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+ struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+
+ if (irq >= GIC_PPI_FIRST && irq <= GIC_PPI_LAST) {
+ gic_data->ppi_data.func = gic_mask_ppi;
+ gic_data->ppi_data.info = &desc->irq;
+ gic_data->ppi_data.flags = 0;
+
+ /* Mask PPIs on all cores during disable. */
+ gic_smp_call_function(&gic_data->ppi_data);
+ }
+
+ desc->chip->mask(irq);
+ desc->status |= IRQ_MASKED;
+}
+#endif
+
static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct gic_chip_data *chip_data = get_irq_data(irq);
@@ -196,6 +275,10 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.set_affinity = gic_set_cpu,
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU
+ .enable = gic_enable_irq,
+ .shutdown = gic_shutdown_irq,
+#endif
};
void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
--
1.7.3.2
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list