[PATCH] mach-ep93xx: checkpatch.pl cleanup

[Ryan Mallon]

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> This cleans up most the checkpatch.pl issues in mach-ep93xx.
> 
>   ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>   WARNING: line over 80 characters
>   WARNING: please, no space before tabs
> 
> The file core.c still produces this warning:
> 
>   WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
> 
> Due to two externs declared for functions in located in gpio.c.
> Since these are __init functions, and not meant to be exposed,
> these warnings were not fixed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com>

I actually think this makes the file less readable in most cases:

> ---
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> index 5f80092..31108d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static struct clk clk_m2m1 = {
>  	.enable_mask	= EP93XX_SYSCON_PWRCNT_DMA_M2M1,
>  };
>  
> -#define INIT_CK(dev,con,ck)					\
> +#define INIT_CK(dev, con, ck)					\
>  	{ .dev_id = dev, .con_id = con, .clk = ck }
>  
>  static struct clk_lookup clocks[] = {
> @@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ static void __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>  			v = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
>  			v |= clk->enable_mask;
>  			if (clk->sw_locked)
> -				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v, clk->enable_reg);
> +				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v,
> +						clk->enable_reg);

This is much harder to read than just having it on a single line, it
doesn't split nicely either.

>  			else
>  				__raw_writel(v, clk->enable_reg);
>  		}
> @@ -246,7 +247,8 @@ static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>  			v = __raw_readl(clk->enable_reg);
>  			v &= ~clk->enable_mask;
>  			if (clk->sw_locked)
> -				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v, clk->enable_reg);
> +				ep93xx_syscon_swlocked_write(v,
> +						clk->enable_reg);
>  			else
>  				__raw_writel(v, clk->enable_reg);
>  		}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> index 8d3f77e..295e513 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> @@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ static struct platform_device ep93xx_ohci_device = {
>  	.name		= "ep93xx-ohci",
>  	.id		= -1,
>  	.dev		= {
> -		.dma_mask		= &ep93xx_ohci_device.dev.coherent_dma_mask,
>  		.coherent_dma_mask	= DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> +		.dma_mask = &ep93xx_ohci_device.dev.coherent_dma_mask,

Breaks the indentation to fix the 80 column limit. Either way is not
perfect, just leave it as is.

>  	},
>  	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_ohci_resources),
>  	.resource	= ep93xx_ohci_resources,
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static struct platform_device ep93xx_fb_device = {
>  	.dev			= {
>  		.platform_data		= &ep93xxfb_data,
>  		.coherent_dma_mask	= DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> -		.dma_mask		= &ep93xx_fb_device.dev.coherent_dma_mask,
> +		.dma_mask = &ep93xx_fb_device.dev.coherent_dma_mask,
>  	},
>  	.num_resources		= ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_fb_resource),
>  	.resource		= ep93xx_fb_resource,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> index cf547ad..68d72cd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gpio.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack(unsigned int irq)
>  	int port = line >> 3;
>  	int port_mask = 1 << (line & 7);
>  
> -	if ((irq_desc[irq].status & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
> +	if ((irq_desc[irq].status & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) ==
> +					IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {

That looks really ugly.

>  		gpio_int_type2[port] ^= port_mask; /* switch edge direction */
>  		ep93xx_gpio_update_int_params(port);
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c
> index 38deaee..ed352ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>  #define SNAPPERCL15_NAND_CEN	(1 << 11) /* Chip enable (active low) */
>  #define SNAPPERCL15_NAND_RDY	(1 << 14) /* Device ready */
>  
> -#define NAND_CTRL_ADDR(chip) 	(chip->IO_ADDR_W + 0x40)
> +#define NAND_CTRL_ADDR(chip)	(chip->IO_ADDR_W + 0x40)

This is okay.

>  static void snappercl15_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd,
>  				      unsigned int ctrl)
> @@ -167,6 +167,6 @@ MACHINE_START(SNAPPER_CL15, "Bluewater Systems Snapper CL15")
>  	.boot_params	= EP93XX_SDCE0_PHYS_BASE + 0x100,
>  	.map_io		= ep93xx_map_io,
>  	.init_irq	= ep93xx_init_irq,
> -	.timer 		= &ep93xx_timer,
> +	.timer		= &ep93xx_timer,
>  	.init_machine	= snappercl15_init_machine,
>  MACHINE_END
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> index 9553031..b981a71 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static struct resource ts72xx_wdt_resources[] = {
>  static struct platform_device ts72xx_wdt_device = {
>  	.name		= "ts72xx-wdt",
>  	.id		= -1,
> -	.num_resources 	= ARRAY_SIZE(ts72xx_wdt_resources),
> +	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(ts72xx_wdt_resources),
>  	.resource	= ts72xx_wdt_resources,
>  };
>  

I don't think it's worth making some lines less readable just to get
them under the 80 column limit.

~Ryan