[PATCH 1/2] [ARM] [IMX]: Removed superfluous checks for argument validity.
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Thu Mar 18 04:37:28 EDT 2010
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:34:50PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hello Uwe,
>
> __clk_enable() and __clk_disable() are recursive with another arguments,
> that means it is hardly possible to remove the checks from them.
ah, at least the check for NULL cannot go away. However IS_ERR(clk)
should hardly matter, shouldn't it?
Maybe the generated code is more optimal when doing:
static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
{
WARN_ON(!clk->usecount);
if (clk->parent)
__clk_disable(clk->parent);
if (clk->secondary)
__clk_disable(clk->secondary);
if (!(--clk->usecount) && clk->disable)
clk->disable(clk);
}
void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
{
BUG_ON(clk == NULL || IS_ERR(clk));
mutex_lock(&clocks_mutex);
__clk_disable(clk);
mutex_unlock(&clocks_mutex);
}
So unless the compiler optimizes well, this reduces the calls of
__clk_disable from three to one for a clock without parent and
secondary.
While at it I wonder if it isn't more correct in __clk_disable to
disable the clock first and only then parent and secondary?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list