board/device file names, and machine names

[Pavel Machek]

> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:17:28AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > > However, we need some future direction ..
> > > 
> > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> > > 
> > > Stick with Google's existing naming for files and interally within files.
> > > Put a comment in the files giving all the names.  Use the common name in
> > > the Kconfig text, and either put the internal names in the help text or
> > > in brackets in the main option text.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Don't like it?  I'm sure there's always going to be someone who doesn't
> > > like whatever is decided upon, so get over it.  The important thing is
> > > that the decision is made, and that there's no further dithering over
> > > this issue.
> > 
> > Does not seem to be your decision. At least you should have cc-ed l-k.
> 
> You really need to get a life.

And you really need to start to behave.

So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
override the decision, without even notifying l-k?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html