No subject

additional IRQs to that.  That's quite small compared to some platforms
which have in the order of 512 or even 1024 IRQs.

> And current kernel don't support the sparse irq feature. then it's
> reasonable to merge it first and revise it later.

sparse irq support has been queued for almost a month for the merge
window which has just this morning opened.  This doesn't help you if
you instantiate all your 360 interrupts though - just because you
don't _use_ an interrupt which has been declared as existing doesn't
reduce the size of the arrays.

> Another why FIMC support is missing? we modified it as his requested
> and send it properly.
> [PATCH v3 3/8] ARM: Samsung: Add platform definitions and helpers for
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=127990218813931&w=2

This looks like it's been missed.  People get busy and miss things on
the mailing list, there's nothing special about that.

> [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: Samsung: Add register definitions for Samsung S5P
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=127990218613922&w=2

Kukjin Kim replied to this one with a point requiring an answer, but
nothing came back.

   "Looks ok...however, I'm still thinking whether really need all these
    definitions."

Seems to be a perfectly reasonable point to raise, and if there's no
reply to justify them...