[RFC PATCH 04/12] arm: mm: cache-l2x0: add l2x0 suspend and resume functions
dwalker at codeaurora.org
Fri Jan 29 14:12:18 EST 2010
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 19:03 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Maybe cache_sync was recently changed to "writel" instead sync_writel()
> > due it getting called with the lock already held.
> It's pointless discussing what the current code does, because that's
> not what mainline does _today_ - the locking in this file has
> completely changed.
Where is the code we should be looking at (what I quoted is from -next)?
Or is it in -next and we just need to look closer ?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel