[PATCH] ARM: MX3: Fixed typo in declared enum type name.

[Daniel Mack]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:35:22PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> According to this issue I have not met problems with mx31lite board,
> surely that's just a typo. Anyway I plan to continue to work with this
> board setup for a while and make some tests of the recent changes
> found in 2.6.33.

Good to hear, more testing is certainly needed.

Thanks,
Daniel


> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Mack <daniel at caiaq.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:12:52PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> To distinguish between mx31lite and mx31lilly boards better to use
> >> different enum types.
> >
> > True, even though it shouldn't have any impact unless you include both
> > headers. I assume you didn't meet any real-life problem with that?
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vzapolskiy at gmail.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel at caiaq.de>
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h
> >> index 0184b63..2b2da03 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h
> >> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> >>
> >>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >>
> >> -enum mx31lilly_boards {
> >> +enum mx31lite_boards {
> >>       MX31LITE_NOBOARD        = 0,
> >>       MX31LITE_DB             = 1,
> >>  };
> >> --
> >> 1.6.5.4
> >>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel