[PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4 build failure
Paul Walmsley
paul at pwsan.com
Wed Jan 20 22:26:44 EST 2010
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > So now it can be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1.
> > I think CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant in that case and should be
> > removed. A patch would be essential to take care of that in the places
> > where it is used. If you feel the same I can send a patch for fixing
> > this.
>
> In the past, there have been some clock, clockdomain, powerdomain, IP
> block, etc. changes going from ES1 to ES2 revisions. But most clocks,
> etc. stay the same. So it seems best to keep the actual CHIP_IS_* bits
> ES-level sensitive, then define a rollup macro like CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 for
> what stays the same. Until ES2 details are available, this shouldn't
> require any further changes to the codebase aside from id.c.
I guess the rollup should probably be CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX. Do you happen to
know whether software will be able to discriminate between 4430 and 4440
chips at run-time, and if so, what mechanism to use?
- Paul
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list