[PATCH] Consolidate clks_register() and similar
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue Jan 12 13:57:57 EST 2010
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:43:54PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> You must have merged you patch first. The removal of line 448:
No - the ep93xx was merged as a whole with the miscellaneous branch,
resulting in no conflicts. Git is occasionally good with merging.
> - int i;
>
> Probably produced a one line fuzz for both patches. Is everything ok still
> for those two patches?
$ diff -u <(pdb getpatch 5879/1) <(git diff-tree -u 346e34abb2c56695ee4bd6af924141c97a0babfb )
--- /proc/self/fd/63 2010-01-12 18:53:48.958011270 +0000
+++ /proc/self/fd/62 2010-01-12 18:53:48.981135820 +0000
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h | 7 +++++--
- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+346e34abb2c56695ee4bd6af924141c97a0babfb
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
-index 1d0f9d8..f77c410 100644
+index 07a58d0..27e3351 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
-@@ -447,25 +447,29 @@ static int __init ep93xx_clock_init(void)
+@@ -449,25 +449,29 @@ static int __init ep93xx_clock_init(void)
u32 value;
int i;
@@ -44,7 +40,7 @@
+ /* Initialize the pll2 derived clocks */
clk_usb_host.rate = clk_pll2.rate / (((value >> 28) & 0xf) + 1);
- printk(KERN_INFO "ep93xx: PLL1 running at %ld MHz, PLL2 at %ld MHz\n",
+ pr_info("PLL1 running at %ld MHz, PLL2 at %ld MHz\n",
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
index d55194a..cd35912 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
So the only difference in the patch is the pr_info line.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list