trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree

Daniel Walker dwalker at codeaurora.org
Sun Jan 10 10:19:05 EST 2010


On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
> 
> 1) mmc.h was missing.
> 
> 2)   CC      arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
> 
> (I provided missing inlines)
> 
> 3)   CC      arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
> No such file or directory
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
> 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
> 

It's still really really un-cooked .. There's tons of compile failures
that still need to be cleanup .. Most of the targets aren't going to
compile without tuning the config some..

What config are you using? I can try to correct some of the compile
failure ..

Daniel




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list