[PATCH] mx31pdk: Add NAND support

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Alberto,

--- On Sat, 2/27/10, Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mx31pdk: Add NAND support
> To: "Fabio Estevam" <fabioestevam at yahoo.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, s.hauer at pengutronix.de
> Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010, 12:25 PM
> Dear Fabio,
> 
> On ven, 2010-02-26 at 17:34 -0800, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> ...
> > 
> > Do you think this patch is OK?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Fabio Estevam
> 
> I do not know if Sascha own an i.MX31 PDK board and I 
> do not know how Sascha could say if your patch is correct
> or not
> until WE (i.MX31 PDK owners) are in disagree on this code.
> So _please_, be _kind_ and continue the debugging of this
> code.

Ok, I just did what all the others i.MX boards did.

> (Why your bootloader correctly read the BBT and the driver
> not?)
> 
> Another thing: I am a new graduated developer, I do this
> work
> keeping in mind my future and until now I am not paid to do
> this.
> What I gain is in experience and resume with my name in the
> 
> kernel Git log.

This is great. Please continue with this work.

> If you are thinking to push my entire work with your name
> only
> because I sent you my own mx31_3ds.c out of this mailing
> list
> you are in _wrong_.

This is not my intention. The mx31_3ds.c you sent me helped me to solve a different issue related to the LCD driver. The NAND patch I submitted in this list is not the same you had in your code as I did not pass flash_bbt.
So your comment that I am pushing your entire work is not fair.

> Review of my work are welcome, BUT please, do not overcome
> me
> thinking that Sascha can merely arbitrate between us. 
> 

Again, Alberto, I would love to work together with you and make i.MX support better.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam