[PATCH 03/13] ARM: LPC32XX: Clock driver

[Kevin Wells]

Hi Russell,

Thanks much for your response on this.

Does it make sense to repost the complete patchset or just the diffs
of the changed files? (clock.h and clock.c).

> 
> There's no requirement to return a rate of zero if the clock is not
> enabled.
> In fact, it's something that should be avoided because it prevents
> querying
> the rate you'll get before enabling the clock (which might affect whether
> you decide to enable it.)
> 

Alright, this reduces some checks. I've also made changes to set_rate
functions to allow clock rate changes without the clock being enabled
or changing the current clock enable state.

thanks,
Kevin