USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Wed Feb 17 15:44:04 EST 2010
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:37:00AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:27 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > We do the same on ARM. The problem with most (all) HCD drivers that do
> > PIO is that they copy the data to the transfer buffer but there is no
> > call in this driver to flush_dcache_page(). The upper mass storage or
> > filesystem layers don't call this function either, so there isn't
> > anything that would set the PG_arch1 bit.
>
> Actually, clear it :-)
>
> I suppose that's one thing that needs to be fixed in the drivers.
No, because that'd probably bugger up the Sparc64 method of delaying
flush_dcache_page.
This method works as follows:
- a page cache page is allocated - this has PG_arch_1 clear.
- IO happens on it and it's placed into the page cache. PG_arch_1 is
still clear.
- someone calls read()/write() which accesses the page. The generic
file IO layers call flush_dcache_page() in response to read()/write()
fs calls. flush_dcache_page() spots that the page is not yet mapped
into userspace, and sets PG_arch_1 to mark the fact that the kernel
mapping is dirty.
- when someone maps the page, we check PG_arch_1 in update_mmu_cache.
If PG_arch_1 is set, we flush the kernel mapping.
Clearly, if we go around having drivers clearing PG_arch_1, this is going
to break horribly.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list