USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Feb 17 04:40:09 EST 2010
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:15 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> We should have changed the subject line.
>
> There's a second problem. It turns out that on ARM
> mapping for DMA must not be done if PIO will be used. Some HCDs
> use PIO for some transfers but DMA for others. The generic layer
> must learn about this.
Ah, that makes a lot of sense and the same problem would happen on
any non-DMA coherent architecture, including some embedded ppc's.
I can see why the dma unmap would invalidate the dcache and blow
away the PIO.
What bugs me here is that the dma_map_* operation should always
be done at the lowest level, ie, the actual HCD driver, and thus
it should be up to the HCD to decide whether to dma_map or not
depending on whether it's going to do DMA or not. I haven't
scrutinized USB lately but if that isn't the case and the dma_map_*
operations are done behind your back by the USB core then that needs to
be changed in a way or another, or hooked at least.
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list