[PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Shawn,

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:01:57AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:00:26PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:31:27AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > looks good
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> > > Thanks.
> > > For such patch acked, do I need to re-send it out when I send out v4 version
> > > of the patch series?
> > As I'm not the imx-maintainer, I'd say yes, send it out (with my ack
> > added) in v4.
> > 
> Richard was trying to understand the correct approach for sending
> patch series.
> 
> I used to only send the updated patches in the new patch series
> since the last series version, while Richard prefer to send all
> the patches in the very single version, even most of them are not
> changed since the last version.
> 
> I think the sending delta way could save bandwidth and ease reviewing
> a little bit, while sending all may be easy for people to pick up
> the patches. So what is the preference for you guys?
It's more usual to always send all patches of the series and that's what
I prefer.  IIRC Russell pointed that out for one of your series, too.
Optimally document for unchanged patches that they are unchanged.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |