[PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Richard,

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:00:26PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:31:27AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:56:02PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > > Because common clock is changing, I don't send out mx50 clock code.
> > > But sure I tested the patch series using the clock code.
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot |    6 +++---
> > >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > index 9939a19..fec7cd9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > > -   zreladdr-y	:= 0x90008000
> > > -params_phys-y	:= 0x90000100
> > > -initrd_phys-y	:= 0x90800000
> > > +   zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90008000
> > > +params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90000100
> > > +initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90800000
> > looks good
> > 
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> Thanks.
> For such patch acked, do I need to re-send it out when I send out v4 version
> of the patch series?
As I'm not the imx-maintainer, I'd say yes, send it out (with my ack
added) in v4.

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |