[PATCH v2] davinci: Add additional JTAG code for AM-1808 and OMAP-L138 Rev 2.0 SoCs

[Michael Williamson]

Hello Sergei,

On 12/24/2010 06:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 23-12-2010 22:24, Michael Williamson wrote:
> 
>> From: Sudhakar Rajashekhara<sudhakar.raj at ti.com>
> 
>> The JTAG variant code for Rev-2.0 silicon of the OMAP-L138 has changed.
>> In addition, the variant code for the AM-1808 SoC appears to match
>> the Rev-2.0 code for the OMAP-L138.  Add an additional entry to support
>> these chips.
> 
>> This patch is orignally from a patch on the arago project, here:
>> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omapl1.git;a=commit;h=6157618435e313a444cdf059702bd34036a6e2b7
> 
>> Further information related to the need for this patch can be located at
>> http://e2e.ti.com/support/embedded/f/354/p/67290/248486.aspx
>> http://linux.davincidsp.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2010-November/021224.html
> 
>> This patch was tested using an AM-1808 SoC on a MityARM-1808 SoM card.  It
>> was also tested using a Rev 1.0 silicon OMAP-L138 on a MityDSP-L138F card.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson at criticallink.com>
>> Tested-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson at criticallink.com>
>> Reported-by: Nicolas Luna <luna.id at gmail.com>
> 
>    I saw that the original patch was signed off by Sudhakar -- why you omitted that?
> 

Ignorance, mostly...

That patch was for the Arago project, and not the mainline, and I wasn't sure if 
I could add a sign-off with express instruction from Sudhakar.  Wasn't trying to 
slight anyone...

I will add Sudhakar's sign-off, assuming that is OK with Sudhakar.

Should I remove my sign-off? 

Thanks for the help.

-Mike