[PATCH v5 6/7] OMAP3: PM: make omap3_cpuidle_update_states independent of enable_off_mode

Nishanth Menon nm at ti.com
Mon Dec 20 21:11:29 EST 2010


Kevin Hilman wrote, on 12/20/2010 06:44 PM:
> Kevin Hilman<khilman at deeprootsystems.com>  writes:
>
>> Nishanth Menon<nm at ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> Currently omap3_cpuidle_update_states makes whole sale decision
>>> on which C states to update based on enable_off_mode variable
>>> Instead, achieve the same functionality by independently providing
>>> mpu and core deepest states the system is allowed to achieve and
>>> update the idle states accordingly.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>>> Acked-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet at ti.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon<nm at ti.com>
>>
>> This patch doesnt' compile with CPUidle enabled.
>>
>> You missed one other caller of the update_states function inside
>> cpuidle34xx.c which is only there when CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
>>
>
> Something like the following folded into this patch makes it compile and
> work as before.
>
> If this looks OK to you, I'll fold it in.
>

Kevin,
thanks. apologies on missing this. looks fine to me.

> Kevin
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx
> index ab4c862..0fb619c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,10 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
>                  return -EINVAL;
>          dev->state_count = count;
>
> -       omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> +       if (enable_off_mode)
> +               omap3_cpuidle_update_states(PWRDM_POWER_OFF, PWRDM_POWER_OFF);
> +       else
> +               omap3_cpuidle_update_states(PWRDM_POWER_RET, PWRDM_POWER_RET);
>
>          if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
>                  printk(KERN_ERR "%s: CPUidle register device failed\n",


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list