[PATCH v2] include/linux: Add missing include / fix build failure
Nick Piggin
npiggin at kernel.dk
Wed Dec 15 21:41:46 EST 2010
Hi Peter,
Thanks for this.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:40:54AM +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe at gmx.de>
>
> This patch fixes a build failure[1-2] by adding the missing asm/memory.h
> include needed for arch_is_coherent().
>
> Error message:
> In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
> from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
> from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
> from include/linux/fs.h:381,
> from arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:4:
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'arch_is_coherent'
>
> KernelVersion: linux-next-20101215
> Used configs: hackkit_defconfig (arm), ep93xx_defconfig (arm)
>
> References:
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651495/
> [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651425/
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe at gmx.de>
> ---
> v2:
> moved additional information in the commit message.
>
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> index e612575..053fad7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm/memory.h>
>
> /*
> * bit-based spin_lock()
The problem is actually in ARM's asm/atomic.h file -- they declare the
smp_mb__before_clear_bit() etc. without providing the necessary includes
to actually call it. Can you include asm/memory.h in there?
Thanks,
Nick
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list