[PATCH 6/9] ARM i.MX51: Add IPU device support
Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
arnaud.patard at rtp-net.org
Wed Dec 15 11:26:20 EST 2010
Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> writes:
Hi,
> On Thursday 09 December 2010, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> +#define imx51_add_ipuv3(pdata) \
>> + imx_add_ipuv3(&imx51_ipuv3_data, pdata)
>
> This looks like a pointless abstraction, it does not make
> the code smaller or easier to read. I know it's sometimes
> tempting to use macros, but in most cases, you should try
> not to.
>
it's how things have been handled atm in the imx code. I don't have
any preference on this at all but at least either we go on with it
or we get rid of all theses #defines. It's a matter of consistency.
The thing is that I would consider removing the imx*add* stuff to be
a cleanup and should be done in a different patch, not in a patchset
adding IPU support for imx51.
Anyway, let's wait for Sascha's point of view, he knows the imx stuff
far better than me.
Arnaud
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list