[PATCH 00/11] OMAP: PRCM/powerdomain/clockdomain patches for 2.6.38,part two

[Santosh Shilimkar]

Paul,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:48 AM
> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Mark Brown; Benoît Cousson; Kevin Hilman; Rajendra Nayak; Peter
> Ujfalusi; Santosh Shilimkar; Jarkko Nikula; Liam Girdwood
> Subject: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: PRCM/powerdomain/clockdomain patches for
> 2.6.38,part two
>
> This patch series, intended for 2.6.38:
>
> - adds OMAP4-specific PRM and CM instance functions, which are capable
>   of writing to PRM/CM instances, no matter what PRCM partition they
>   appear in;
>
> - renames the old OMAP2/3 PRM and CM functions to prefix them with
>   'omap2_';
>
> - adds OMAP4 clockdomain offset addressing to the OMAP4 clockdomain
>   definitions;
>
> - removes the (now unused) OMAP clockdomain .clkstctrl_reg field;
>
> - moves plat-omap/include/plat/{clock,power}domain.h to mach-omap2/,
since
>   these are OMAP2-specific;
>
> - moves the OMAP3 SCM padconf save code from pm34xx.c into the SCM
common
>   code.
>
> This series is available via git from git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 in
> the branch 'pwrdm_prcm_b_2.6.38'.  It applies on top of the "OMAP:
> PRCM/powerdomain/clockdomain patches for 2.6.38, part one" series,
> sent earlier.
>
> Kevin and OMAP ASoC-hackers, I'd appreciate review and acks, if
> appropriate, on the patches that touch code that you maintain.  TI
> OMAP4 PM people, I would appreciate any testing assistance that you
> may be able to provide.  Benoît, I've tried to keep the kernel data
> files and the output of the scripts relatively similar, but we might
> need to do some tweaking of the scripts or data files to align them
> in the way that makes the most sense.
>
> Boot-tested on N800, OMAP35xx Beagle, and OMAP4430ES2 Panda.
>
>
Have tested both part1 and part2 of your series on OMAP4 and OMAP3 SDPs.
OFF mode works on OMAP3 SPD with this series.
Was planning to do some more testing with some porting of OMAP4 PM
but it's taking bit more time.

Regards,
Santosh