[PATCH v5 07/15] ARM: mxs: Add gpio support

Shawn Guo shawn.guo at freescale.com
Mon Dec 13 02:28:14 EST 2010


Hi Uwe,

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:24:16AM -0700, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:06:40PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
[...]
> > +int __init mxs_gpio_init(struct mxs_gpio_port *port, int cnt)
> > +{
> > +	int i, j;
> > +
> > +	/* save for local usage */
> > +	mxs_gpio_ports = port;
> > +	gpio_table_size = cnt;
> > +
> > +	pr_info("MXS GPIO hardware\n");
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > +		/* disable the interrupt and clear the status */
> > +		__raw_writel(0, port[i].base +
> > +				PINCTRL_PIN2IRQ(i));
> > +		__raw_writel(0, port[i].base +
> > +				PINCTRL_IRQEN(i));
> > +		__raw_writel(~0, port[i].base +
> > +				PINCTRL_IRQSTAT(i) + MXS_CLR_ADDR);
> Why not __raw_writel(0, port[i].base + PINCTRL_IRQSTAT(i)) ?
> (And note that applying ~ on a signed integer isn't portable in
> general.  For all sane archs this is the same as ~0U though and ARM is
> sane (here), still I think it's good to be aware of such things and
> avoid them if easily possible.)
> 
The i.MX28 RM section 9.4.78 tells "Software may clear any bit in this
register by writing a 1 to the bit at the SCT clear address".

What about writing 0xffffffff into clear address?

Regards,
Shawn




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list