[PATCH] at91: Refactor Stamp9G20 and PControl G20 board file

[Igor Plyatov]

Dear Christian,

> As PControl G20 is a carrier board for the Stamp9G20 SoM, some code can
> be shared. Therefore board-stamp9g20.c is refactored to allow reusing the
> SoM initialization and board-pcontrol-g20.c is modified to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Glindkamp <christian.glindkamp at taskit.de>
> ---
> 
> How about this approach? Compile tested for PControl G20 and run time tested
> for Stamp9G20 EVB and PortuxG20.
> 
> Just a side note: PortuxG20 is not a carrier board for the Stamp9G20. It just
> shares so much with the evaluation board, that it makes sense to put them both
> into the same file. And there is no intention to put other boards into this
> file.

The idea from this patch is clean.
Yours patch does not apply to the kernel from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git,
but I apply its content by hands and kernels compiled successfully with
stamp9g20_defconfig and pcontrol_g20_defconfig.

Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with you patch and correct all errors
and warnings reported. 

If you will correct this patch, to be applicable, then I will vote to
include it into mainline.

Which kernel repository and branch should I use for the AT91 ARM?
I just want to know - whereto send my next patch to support gms machine?

Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov