[PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
Daniel Walker
dwalker at codeaurora.org
Wed Dec 8 16:07:59 EST 2010
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests
> > showed a decrease ..
>
> Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the
> header in addition to the others.
So is there a problem with doing the inlining then ? If you get the same
size kernel, then that seems like a lateral move in your case.
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list